Why are circumcised guys more offended

by what we call circumcision than they are by the act of circumcision itself? For example, if I refer to circumcision as mutilation, they'll freak the out over it and cry and shit their diapers, but if you call circumcision a word that's synonymous with mutilation, and basically just means mutilation anyway, they won't bat an eye. If I say a circumcised penis is mangled, butchered, disfigured, maimed, or whatever else, they're perfectly fine with it, even though they basically mean the same thing as mutilated. But if I very specifically say "mutilated", and just that one, specific word in particular, they lose their fucking minds.

Like, why are you more bothered by what we CALL the act of slicing apart a baby's dick than you are by the actual ACT of slicing apart a baby's dick itself? "Oh, I'm perfectly fine with slicing apart a baby's penis, but just don't call it mutilation when you do it, that would be horrible. No, no, it's not the ACT of permanently disfiguring and mutilating a baby's penis that bother's me, it's the act of calling it "mutilation" that bothers me. I'm perfectly fine with the torturous removal of flesh part, though." Do you not realize how dumb that line of reasoning is? Call the act of slicing apart a penis "circumcision"? Oh, that's no problem. Call the act of slicing apart a penis "mutilation" though? Oh, now we've got a problem, for some reason. It's literally the exact same act, but for some reason you think what we call it either makes it worse or better. It doesn't. You people are fucking morons, I swear.

Imagine doing that with other acts. But before I get to the examples, I know you circumcised retards don't understand how analogies work and therefore won't understand that what's being argued isn't about what's worse. In the upcoming analogy, I'm NOT comparing circumcision to rape and murder and saying they're on the same level or that one is worse than the other (although, circumcision IS worse than rape). That's not the point. The point of the analogy I'm about to make is to highlight the fact that what we call an act doesn't change the severity of the act. It's still equally bad no matter what you call it.

Example 1: Rape doesn't suddenly become less severe if you refer to it as a "struggle snuggle". No one is gonna hear you refer to it as "wrestle sex" and then be like "Wow, that doesn't sound so bad." No, you'll still fully understand that rape is horrible and trying to call it something that sounds a little nicer doesn't change the severity of the act. The same goes for circumcision and mutilation.

Example 2: Murder doesn't suddenly become less severe if you refer to it as "unaliving". No one is gonna hear you refer to murdering someone as "deleting" them and then be like "Oh, that doesn't sound as bad." Again, they fully understand what the act is and how severe the act is, and they know that calling it something other than "murder" isn't going to change the severity of the act. Again, the same goes for circumcision and mutilation.

It doesn't matter what we call the act, all that matters is the act itself and the severity of that act. Whether you refer to the act of permanently removing a baby's foreskin by slicing it apart as "circumcision" or "mutilation", the fact remains that it still an evil, horrible, fucked up thing to do, regardless of what we call it. Get it through your thick fucking skulls.

---

anonymous Body July 17, 2026 at 1:28 am 1 0