the narcissist spammer is back. the narcissist thinks she so superior that her made up defintion of copyright infringement should be adopted by all. Copyright infringement is plainly posting work without the author's permission. Nothing less, but the narcissist never will need the author's permission, because she is superior and doesn't need anyone's permission to steal their work and post it whereever the narcissist wants. Then the narcissist will complain other people are not psychologists or lawyers while she is constantly pretending to be one herself. anonymousOther April 01, 2023 at 9:49 am00
I am neither a narcissist, spammer, and I am not guilty of copyright infringement. We have bedn over this already. You are trying to usethis as an excuse to cover up news articles that expose the corruption of far right religious hypocrisy. Posting a news article on a rant website with proper credits given does not constitute copyright infringement. Copyright holders hold the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and adapt their works. Providing credit to the original author while accurately quoting or posting the link to the article is not in violation of those rights, and therefore does not go against the law. However, if the post is modified or altered with misinformation or incorrect attributions, then it is possible to be in violation of the law. The articles are copied as is with full credits intact. anonymous 2 years ago
Posting a news article on a rant website with the proper credits given does not constitute copyright infringement. This can be determined by looking at the four factors of fair use; purpose and character, nature of the copyrighted material, amount used, and effect on the market. As long as the user is not misusing or altering the copyrighted material and is properly attributing the article to its respective author, then there is no infringement. Essentially, presenting original work with the proper citations is not a form of copyright infringement. anonymous 2 years ago
this bitch crazy. copyright infringement definition: Copyright infringement is the violation, piracy, or theft of the exclusive rights of the owner or holder of a copyrighted material or work. Those rights include reproduction, the preparation of derivative works, distributing copies by sale or rental, and public performance or display. It is the use or production of such material without the permission or license of the owner or holder. anonymous 2 years ago
While posting a news article with credits intact may seem like a violation of copyright law, such activity can actually fall under the fair use clause. Fair use law is a doctrine that provides an exception to the exclusive right of copyright holders in regards to the use of copyrighted material. It allows for limited use of copyrighted material in ways that benefit the public. Examples of such uses include making copies for educational purposes, critiquing and commenting on copyrighted works, and creating freedoms of expression. Since the purpose of pisting them is to educate the public about the consequences of political extremism it does indeed fall under fair use. anonymous 2 years ago
It's not possible to convince a narcissist of the reality of something as easy as the defintion of a word or phrase. Look how she pretends to be a lawyer and thinks whatever false narrative she creates should be adopted by all and be the new reality for all. anonymous 2 years ago
Such a lazy and pathetic attempt to gaslight. Any lawyer will tell you fair use does apply and therefore it is not copyright infringement. The mere fact the only one with any issues understanding that is you is proof enough. Not one news agency has contacted me to complain or issue a takedown. You just can't stand that I have evidence of the evils committed by your radicalized zealots. anonymous 2 years ago
The notion that the fair use clause is a false narrative is wrong. Fair use is a principle of United States copyright law that recognizes that certain uses of copyrighted material, such as for educational and scholarly use, are not infringement of copyright. This clause has been recognized by United States copyright law since the 1970s, and was designed to protect the public’s right to access and use copyrighted material. The decision of whether or not a particular use qualifies as “fair use” is ultimately decided by a court, but there are certain criteria that can be used to determine if a use may be considered fair. These criteria include the purpose and character of the use, the amount and substantiality of the work being used, and the potential effect on the potential market for the original copyrighted work. Thus, the notion that fair use is a false narrative is not correct. anonymous 2 years ago
You are without a doubt the real narcissist for taking down the posts you don't like in order to protect hateful and bigoted far right views. You are disgusting for doing that and if anyone has resson to spin a false narrative its you. You are against education after all. Educated people aren't so easy to control. anonymous 2 years ago
A narcissist spammer that calls other people narcissist , how original . anonymous 2 years ago
That crazy lady says no news agency contacted her when she never gives anyone one of them her contact info to do so. OMG anonymous 2 years ago
They can easily track me down with their resources if they wanted to. anonymous 2 years ago
So the narcissist spammer wants news agencies to sue websites in order to get subpoenas in order to tracker her down. Yeah that’s not narcissism at all anonymous 2 years ago
I don't want them to obviously. I just said if they wanted to they could. You are the only one who would bother. You're the narcissist trying to control the narrative by deleting posts and that's fact. anonymous 2 years ago
Lmao the narcissist now thinks she’s omnipotent and thinks I own the site anonymous 2 years ago
Yet you posted about 20 of these today anonymous 2 years ago
Who tf said anything about omnipotent anonymous 2 years ago
Had to repost after you kept deleting everything because you are drunk on the power of silencing any opinions because you are too cowardly and lazy to debate anonymous 2 years ago
17 Rant Comments
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago
anonymous 2 years ago