completely insane

The whole thing is completely insane.

You've got all of these people saying that they have concerns for their safety.

But none of those people claiming to have safety concerns are actually making any type of allegation against me.

Safety concerns that are not based on allegations are based on what?

If they're not alleging that I did anything to them what are their sagety concerns based on?

My history?

My only history is one complaint filed by Josee Plante that was dismissed by the Sarnia Police Service as baseless! And it was dismissed as baseless by Constable Frank McCormick of the Sarnia Police Service when Josee Plante and her manager ESCALATED their complaint.

So it's not a case where her complaint was just arbitrarily dismissed. Josee Plante and her manager ESCALATED their complaint to Inspector Phil Nelson who assigned the matter to Constable Frank McCormick of the Criminal Investigation Division. It was Constable Frank McCormick who dismissed her complaint as baseless.

Then Josee Plante and her absolute imbecile of a manager decided to take matters into their own hands and started falsely maligning me as a stalker.

Not only did this lunatic think that being spoken to TWO TIMES in the SPAN OF NINE MONTHS was a crime... But this lunatic also expected me to be arrested for speaking to her TWO TIMES!

And when I was not arrested for speaking to her TWO TIMES she and her manager began falsely maligning me as a predator and started invading my privacy and harassing me.

Then when I confronted her in 2002 about falsely maligning me she started embellishing her story. She started falsely accusing me of sending her love letters, et al.

So basically it boils down to this:

People are expressing concerns for their safety BUT they're not alleging that I'm doing anything to them.

So why do they have concerns for their safety if I'm not doing anything to them and they're not making allegations against me?

Is it because of my history?

My only history is a complaint that was filed by Josee Plante that was dismissed as baseless by the Criminal Investigation Division when she and her manager esclated it.

So why are people expressing concerns for their safety when they're not alleging that I am doing anything to them... AND I have no history of anything except ONE complaint filed by ONE Josee Plante in July 2000 that was dismissed as baseless by the Criminal Investigation Division?

Apparently this fucking lunatic Josee Plante and her fucking lunatic manager think that they can file a baseless complaint against me... Have their baseless complaint dismissed as baseless by the Sarnia Police Service's Criminal Investigation Division... Then start falsely maligning me as a predator and invading my privacy... Apparently expecting me NOT to be outraged that I am being falsely maligned as a predator... And apparently expecting people to believe that my outrage over being falsely maligned as a predator and having my privacy invaded proves me obsessed and a stalker. Apparently this fucking nutjob thinks that my outrage over being falsely maligned by her and her manager makes their previous baseless complaint anythng other than baseless. Which is completely absurd.

And it's their falsely maligning me as a predator that is responsible for me being treated unfairly. It's also their falsely maligning me as a predator that is the reason people that are not making allegations against me are expressing concerns for their safety, despite there being no credible basis for those concerns. And the people falsely maligning me as a predator and causing me to be treated unfairly are using my outrage over being falsely maligned as a predator and treated unfairly as the SOLE BASIS for their alarmist fear mongering.

And they are playing the MENTAL ILLNESS card to have me dismissed arbitrarily as mentally ill so that they can have their falsehoods accepted as the truth.

I AM TOTALLY SUING YOU!

And I can't believe the bullshit that you people are spewing to support your false and idiotic narrative!

There's the defense lawyer, Bob McFadden, who wants the Law Society of Upper Canada to believe that I'm claiming to have been railroaded on my previous harassment conviction too. Ostensibly, to make the point that claiming to be railroaded is a pattern for me. Problem is that I had no prior harassment conviction and a simple fact check by the Law Society of Upper Canada would have revealed that.

The defense lawyer, Bob McFadden, also wants the Law Society of Upper Canada to believe that I filed several complaints against the investigating officer and that all those complaints were "dismissed as the ravings of a person suffering from a major mental disorder." Ostensibly, to portray me as a person who makes crazy unfounded allegations that are ultimately dismissed as unsubstantiated on the basis that I have some form of mental illness. The truth however is that what Mr. McFadden told the Law Society was a complete work of fiction. There were not several complaints filed against the investigating officer and there were no complaints filed that were dismissed "as the ravings of a person suffering from a major mental disorder" according to Inspector Robert Farlow of the Professional Standards Branch of the Sarnia Police Service.

You're not getting away with anything! Not a damn thing!

Not only am I suing the Plante family and her manager, I'm also going to bring formal criminal charges against both her and her family and her manager and everyone else that was complicit in her more than twenty years of criminal harassment and other crimes.

Good luck to you!

I alleged that Bob McFadden didn't provide me disclosure prior to trial (I didn't get disclosure prior to trial... That's why I didn't know that I had been allegedly sending her love letters). McFadden's response to that allegation was:

He received the disclosure from the Crown and he gave it to his staff. He then went on to describe in detail how the Sarnia Jail handles disclosure. His one glaring omission was that he didn't say when he brought the disclosure to the jail. He says when he received the disclosue from the crown and then he jumped into explaining what the jail does with disclosure when they receive disclosure for an accused person. He just doesn't say when he dropped the disclosure off at the jail. He doesn't say when he delivered the disclosure to the jail.

After explaining when he received the disclosure from the crown... After explaining what the jail does with disclosure once they receive it... He goes on to try to blame me for not telling him that I hadn't received disclosure. He writes that he didn't know that I hadn't received disclosure because I didn't tell him that I hadn't received disclosure. Apparently, he didn't feel it necessary to explain how the jail handles accused persons denied bail. Apparently, he didn't feel it necessary to inform the Law Society that the Sarnia Jail doesn't allow accused persons denied bail to sign themselves out of jail to go visit their lawyer. It must have slipped his mind that a person denied bail can only speak to their lawyer if their lawyer makes themselves available to their client to be spoken to. I also complained that he didn't return my calls either. He didn't even bother to respond to that complaint.

YOU ARE NOT GETTING AWAY WITH A FUCKING THING ANYMORE!

I AM NOT GOING TO TOLERATE ANY OF YOUR MENTAL ILLNESS GARBAGE ANYMORE!

And the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario who refused to investigate my complaint that Dr. Swaminath misdiagnosed me? What kind of crackpot idiocy is that? You're not going to investigate allegations that a person was misdiagnosed because the misdignoses were part of a criminal prosecution? Are the people at the CPSO stupid or do the people at the CPSO think that I am stupid?

IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THE DIAGNOSES WERE MADE AS PART OF A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION!

It doesn't matter! It doesn't matter because the issue is not the outcome of the trial. The issue is not whether the verdict was correct. The issue is not my guilt or innocence. The issue is the correctness of the diafnoses and the basis on which those diagnoses were made. And it's not as though the diagnoses made by Dr. Swaminath were made based on information that I'm not privy to. It was a criminal proceeding! Everything on which the Crown was making their case should have been provided to me in Disclosure. Which means that Dr. Swaminath should have only made his diagnoses on the basis of what the Crown was presenting in court (disclosure) and what he and his staff observed while monitoring me over the course of the 30 day assessment. There should have been nothing made available to Dr. Swaminath that wasn't also made available to me as part of disclosure.

So the excuse offered by the CPSO that they could not investigate my allegations that I was misdiagnosed because it was part of a criminal prosecution doesn't hold water. It doesn't hold water because everything that was made available to Dr. Swaminath by the Crown should have also been made available to me in disclosure. Also the issue is not my guilt or innocence, but whether the diagnoses of Dr. Swaminath were correct and whether Dr. Swaminath misdiagnosed me. Also, that argument doesn't hold water because that proceeding was concluded in September 2002. It is not a proceeding "in progress" it is a proceeding that was concluded long ago.

The criminal proceeding EXCUSE is only valid when the PROCEEDING IS NOT YET CONCLUDED. And in this particular case IT IS CONCLUDED! The CPSO is only offering such excuses because they KNOW THE DIAGNOSES TO BE INCORRECT and they are being PREJUDICED BY THE VERY THING THAT I WAS ALLEGING JOSEE PLANTE TO BE ENGAGING IN WHEN I WAS ARRESTED AND MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED IN 2002!

I'm not wrong at all! And you're not going to force me to be the victim of a crime with that kind of garbage!

---

William David Duke Other November 10, 2024 at 11:31 am 0 0