Circumcision needs to be discussed much more

To that one moron who has a problem with circumcision being discussed, no, we should not stop talking about it. Not talking about it prevents people from being educated about it, which simply leads to more babies being circumcised. That's a very bad thing to do. The more we talk about it, though, the more ideas people can come up with and the more people can be educated on the matter and the more circumcisions can be stopped. So, no, we should NOT stop talking about it, we should talk about 1 million times more than we already do. It actually doesn't get discussed enough.

>"LITERALLY EVERY PENIS LOOKS WEIRD."
Nope. Only circumcised looks weird. Uncut dicks are so pretty and sexy and gorgeous and perfect in every way. Circumcised dicks are fuck-ugly, repulsive abominations. Nothing pretty about a mutilated penis. Nothing at all.

>"Being shitty to people over shit they cannot control is fucking INSANE to me."
It's not insane at all, and I'm tired of you fuckwits using this poor excuse as a way to get out of being made fun of. It's a shit argument. You retards also conveniently ignore the reasons why someone might make fun of a circumcised guy, and you deliberately ignore the actions of circumcised men when they say shit to bring these consequences on to themselves. When I make fun of a circumcised guy, it's usually done in retaliation to him making fun of uncut guys first. He's the one who started it, so I'm just giving him back what he deserves. If you don't want me to say that circumcised dicks are ugly, then don't say that foreskin is ugly. Simple as that. Don't dish it out if you can't take it back. Also, no one is specifically targeting circumcised men who are AGAINST circumcision, you dumbass, they're targeting circumcised men who DEFEND circumcision and act like being circumcised is the greatest thing ever, and your kind just end up getting caught in the crossfire because it's easier to generalize against all circumcised men, since so many circumcised men defend circumcision. Like, holy shit, dude, how is this so hard for you to understand? You should just automatically understand that no is intentionally trying to go after circumcised men who are anti-circ, and remove yourself from the equation. It's that simple. It's not about you, it's about them. You should know this.

>"You aren't gonna get circumcision banned by acting like a fucking douche-nozzle to everyone that's had one."
Yes, actually, we will, because if we shame circumcised men and make them feel stigmatized, they will be less inclined to circumcise their sons due to the stigma attached to being circumcised, you fucking idiot. Shame and stigmatization is an extremely effective tool. You really haven't thought this through very well, have you? I've spent the last 13 years thinking and arguing about this shit, so I've had plenty of time to come up with unbeatable arguments on the matter, and this is one them that no one can beat. The fact of the matter is simply that you don't wanna be made fun of for being circumcised because it hurts your precious feefees. It's really as simple as that. Which is a dick move to the millions of babies that are gonna end up being circumcised because of your inaction and lack of willingness to employ a method that will actually reduce circumcision rates. But no, you'd rather let millions of babies be circumcised and spare people's feelings than hurt a couple of feelings and prevent millions of babies from being circumcised. You people truly are absolute morons who have everything backwards. I truly despise you people.

---

anonymous Body August 19, 2026 at 3:09 am 1 0