women need to say that circumcised dicks are ugly

Circumcised dicks are ugly and more women need to express this sentiment

Sorry, circumcucks, but your mutilated dicks are just straight up ugly. They are. They're gross looking as fuck. They're all dried out, cracked, calloused, scarred, disfigured, mutilated, desensitized, they look a burn victim's skin or an acid attack victim's skin or a skin graft or a scab in its final stages of healing, and the ugly as fuck scar looks like someone smeared a ring of shit around your dick. Fucking yuck. The ugly two-tone look makes it look like a Frankenstein's monster of a penis where you took separate parts of other people's penises and stitched them together. How can you not be grossed out by them?

Any woman who tells you otherwise is lying to you. No woman on the planet actually likes circumcised penises, none, zero, it's a lie that's no different to when they claim to prefer dad bods. No woman on the planet prefers dad bods and no woman prefers circumcised dicks. They're just trying to virtue signal and look good in the eyes of others by pretending that they're able to see past the flawed ugliness of your disfigured, mutilated cock, but they can't, it grosses women out. All women can think about when they see your mangled dick is the image of a baby screaming in absolute hellish agony as the most sensitive part of his body gets horrifically sliced apart and mutilated with surgical tools, and they just want the image to get out of their heads. No woman wants that image in their head when they look at your dick.

Uncut dicks LOOK better, FEEL better, are more FUN to play with, and are actually MORE hygienic, since uncut guys actually wash their dicks, whereas mutilated cucks mistakenly think a circumcision is a replacement for a bath and that they magically just never need to wash it. No, circy, you still need to wash your ugly, butchered dick.

Everybody, but especially women in particular, needs to start making fun of circumcised guys and saying things like "circumcised dicks are ugly and disgusting", "uncut dicks look a million times better", "I would never date a circumcised guy", "I only fuck uncut guys", etc. This will create a stigma around both circumcised penises AND the act circumcision of itself, which will in turn cause the circumcision rates to drop, as stigmatization is a very effective tool for getting people to change their minds/do what you want.

The logic is simple: If women start saying that circumcised dicks are ugly and gross and this becomes a prevalent opinion in society, parents will go "What? Women hate circumcised penises and think they're ugly? Well, no son of mine is going to have a gross, ugly, mutilated penis that women are going to be disgusted by! That settles it, we are not having our child circumcised! We want women to actually like his penis when he grows up." And it has to be mostly women expressing these sentiments, since when men complain about shit, everyone just ignores them, whereas if women complain about shit, people will actually listen to them and things will actually get done.


Now for some preemptive counterarguments, since I already know what you're going to say:

>"B-b-but, we shouldn't make fun of circumcised guys".

Yes we should. Especially since in doing so, it will lower the circumcision rates, which is a noble enough reason in and of itself to do so. Nothing else will work. Educating people on the matter only has limited potential. Stigmatizing everything surrounding circumcision will lead to greater and quicker results. Sorry, but you're wrong. It just will. Besides, circumcised guys don't get made fun of enough. What, they can say whatever they want about uncut dicks without repercussion and uncut guys just have to sit there and take it, but as soon as an uncut guy retaliates and says something bad about circumcised dicks, the little circy becomes a victim, even if he was being antogonistic for 5 hours straight and started this whole thing in the first place? Fuck off, he's not a victim, he's an asshole who deserves to be put in his place. What the fuck's with this idiotic double standard? Knock it the fuck off.

Also, do you not realize how fucked up it is of you to allow potentially millions of babies to continue being circumcised, simply because you didn't want to hurt the feelings of a few circumcised losers who can just suck it the fuck up and learn how to handle having their feelings hurt? How do you not realize that allowing babies to continue to be circumcised is the far more egregious offense in this situation? Who could possibly think that hurting someone's pwecious widdle fee-fees is somehow worse than a baby having its penis horribly fucking mutilated and disfigured, which is a million times worse? What kind of ass-backwards way of thinking is that? What the fuck's wrong with you?

---
>"Women's preference shouldn't matter!"

Yes it should. It absolutely should, and it does. All women on the planet without one single exception should all prefer uncut dicks and ONLY like uncut dicks, as that's the default state of things and is the default preference anyway. They should all be grossed out by circumcised dicks and hate them. And why wouldn't you be grossed out by a missing body part? It's only natural that we feel disgust towards such things. You can say it's mean, but who gives a fuck? It's your instinct to feel revulsion towards missing parts of the body. You should feel the same type of disgust for circumcised penises that you feel when you see a guy who's missing an arm, or half his face, or is a burn victim. That's why no woman should ever say she has no preference between cut or uncut. Bitch, you do have a preference, and you prefer uncut. Stop trying to be nice.

---
>"B-but, a-a-all penises are gross".

Nope. Only circumcised ones are. Uncut dicks are perfect and are superior in every way.

---
>"Cut and uncut penises look the same when the foreskin is retracted!"

No they don't. One has a gross, ugly, unsightly scar on it that looks ring of shit was smeared around it, is cracked, calloused, dried out, emasculated, desensitized, gross and looks like some Frankenstein's monster abomination of separate penis parts that were stitched together, the other is an uncut penis that is aesthetically pleasing to look at, is smooth, supple, soft, sensitive, primal, masculine, and is way more visually interesting and appealing. Also, uncut dicks look better when the foreskin still covers the head. Not enough people express that opinion and need to do it more often.

---
>"Well, I'm a woman and I thin-".

Nope, you're not a woman at all. You're a mentally ill troon. Shut your mouth, your opinion is worthless.

---
"Well, I've been with uncut guys who..."

You've never once been with an uncut guy in your entire life. Shut the fuck up and stop making shit up. Even if you had, whatever problem they had was specific to them and not representative of all uncut guys. Stop being fucking stupid. Imagine if guys did that... "Yeah, I slept with this one chick who had a smegma ridden pussy, that must mean that literally all women have smegma ridden pussies". Do you see how dumb that sounds? That's what you sound like when you say shit like that. Knock it the fuck off, you braindead idiot.

---
>"Y-y-you're c-c-coping, a-anteater-dick!"

What would I possibly have to cope with? My uncut, natural, normal dick looks a million times better than yours, feels better than yours, is more fun to play with, is more hygienic, and is preferred by women. Your dick, on the other hand, is ugly as fuck, repulsive as shit, and was mutilated at birth at the behest of the very people who were supposed to protect you. Your insecure father had your penis disfigured because he couldn't bear to let you have something that he didn't. Classic fox without a tail and crab mentality. And yes, it was your FATHER who wanted you circumcised, not your MOTHER. You circumcucks always use this as a coping mechanism, and your line of reasoning is "Well, I may be circumcised, but at least it's because a WOMAN wanted it done, even if it was my own mother." It gives you this false idea that your mutilation was done because of female preference (even though it wasn't because of "female preference"), and that somehow makes it justified in your mind. What a weird way to cope. Also, less than 0.1% of circumcisions are performed due to female preference. Not that any women actual does prefer them, mind you. The vast majority (80%+) are done because the father is circumcised, a further 10% is because of religion/tradition, 5% is because of the hygiene myth, 4% is for conformity, <1% is for aesthetics (even though circumcised dicks are ugly, so if wanted him to have an aesthetic dick, you would leave him uncut), and less than 1% is because the mother wanted it done. Anyway, keep coping. Whatever it takes to make yourself feel better.

---
>"Uncut dicks smell and are prone to STDs".

The genital hygiene of someone is going to come down to the individual, not whether he's circumcised or not. Most uncut guys, meaning 99.999%, wash their dicks and they never smell or get smegma. And speaking of smegma, did you know that you can still get smegma if you're circumcised? Yep, that's right. So your mutilation was ultimately for nothing if it was done for "hygiene purposes". Circumcised dicks can still get dirty. They're not somehow magically clean, 24/7, 365 days of the year. If a circumcised guy goes a day or two without washing, his penis will stink and become dirty.

Oh, and just as a personal pet peeve of mine... Ladies, when you say you like uncut dicks, can you please stop adding the unnecessary caveat of "well, as long as it's clean". You sound fucking stupid when you do that. First of all, it IS clean. Second, you should just automatically expect it to be clean by default. Why wouldn't you? No guy does that with your pussies. No guy feels the need to, because we automatically assume that your twat's gonna be clean. Why wouldn't it be? Even though we have way more reason to be concerned with YOUR hygiene, since vaginas get dirty quicker and able to get dirtiER. So you're in no position to say "as long as it's clean". Yeah, if fucking is. Assume it's clean by default, like we do for you, assholes. Why wouldn't be? Stop being dumb, you fucking idiots. And third, there's this implication that you either think circumcised dicks are always clean (they're not) and can't get dirty (they can), or that you would be fine with a circumcised dick, even if it was dirty. So stop saying it. It's unnecessary and moronic of you. And if you are gonna say it, at least add the caveat to circumcised dicks, as well, okay?

Also, when talking about foreskin, say the full fucking word. Why does everyone seem the have an aversion to saying "foreskin"? Why does everyone feel the need to shorten it to "skin" or "the skin or "your skin". Just say "foreskin", say the full word. It's so unsexy when you just say "skin". "I love your skin". No, say "I love your foreskin". Is that really so hard? It shouldn't be.

As for STDs and STIs, circumcised dicks are actually more likely to contract diseases and infections, as the abrasiveness of the exposed glans can cause minor lacerations to occur and cause bleeding which could get inside your body. Uncut penises can't cause this problem. The foreskin also contains Langerhans cells which actually PROTECT you from things like STDs and STIs. Myth debunked. Eat shit.

---
>"My wife prefers my mutilated dick!"

No she doesn't. She fucking hates your ugly, inferior, circumcised dick. She cheats on you and cucks you with uncut dicks because she prefers them and only uncut dicks can satisfy her. She fucking hates your worthless excuse for a dick.

---
>"Wow, this dude's so obsessed with other men's penises!"

...*Sigh* Good comeback, bro... Good comeback... Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get me with something better next time... Seriously, that's a pretty fucking weak comeback after I trashed the everloving fuck out of you in a way that you'll literally never be able to recover from. Like, really? That's all you had to say? THAT'S the absolute best that you could possibly come up with? THAT?! Okay, man... Whatever.

---
>"Who cares about this anyway?"

I do, and you should too. Apathy isn't the correct position to take on this matter. Why would you think that it would be? You don't sound cool, detached, and stoic, you just sound like a moron who had nothing to say, but still felt like saying something solely for the sake of saying something. Don't do that. It just makes you sound dumb. It's also not a subject that you should be indifferent about, you sick fuck. Stop being evil and start caring about circumcision, you evil, evil person. You're a bad person for not caring.

---
>"There's no difference! Cut and uncut feel the same!"

Nope. Blatantly false and is demonstrably false. Biomechanically speaking, it is actually physically impossible for uncut and circumcised penises to feel the same in any way. The foreskin adds so much to the penis, and the removal of said foreskin takes away so much from it. For example, the foreskin adds extra actual physical sensation that the woman can feel inside her vagina. She can feel the texture of the foreskin and the different parts of the penis. The texture of the foreskin is very smooth and silk-like, and the woman can actually feel the silky smoothness of the foreskin when it's inside her. A circumcised penis feels very coarse, dry, abrasive and rough, almost like sandpaper.

Okay, but you want to say that cut and uncut dicks feel the same, huh? Okay, imagine a silky smooth cloth going inside a vagina... How do you think that would feel? Well, it would be very soft, smooth, and have basically zero friction, wouldn't it? Okay. Now, imagine a piece of sandpaper going inside a vagina... How the fuck do you think that's gonna feel, huh? It's gonna be rough, coarse, abrasive, and have a massive level of friction, isn't it? Well, that's basically the difference in feeling between a cut dick and an uncut dick. It's not even close. And to the one dipshit who's gonna say "What? You think a circumcised dick is 100% exactly like sandpaper?!" No, fuckhead, it's called an analogy. Get a fucking brain. So, yeah, it's actually physiologically impossible for cut and uncut dicks to feel the same, as they have completely different textures to them.

The foreskin is also designed to limit friction as much as possible, which is just one of many of it's 16+ functions. It does this through it's gliding mechanism, silky smooth texture, and keeping the female's natural lubricant inside the vagina. Circumcised dick's don't have this function and instead scrape out the vaginal fluids and drying out the vagina with every thrust outwards, while also causing abrasions. Ladies, if you've ever felt sore after sex (you're not supposed to, by the way, that isn't normal), it's because your bf is circumcised, not because he's big. Uncut dicks don't cause this problem.

So, not only do cut and uncut dicks not FEEL the same, they don't even FUNCTION the same.

---
>"Circumcised dicks are just as sensitive!"

Nope. It's literally physically impossible for them to be as sensitive. The glans (head) of the penis contains 4,000 nerve endings, the foreskin contains 20,000 for a total of 24,000 nerve endings that are responsible for allowing you to feel pleasure. To put this into perspective, the clitoris contains 8,000 nerve endings, with the clitoral hood and labia adding around another 5,000-7,000 nerve endings, totaling 13,000-15000, nerve endings. Now, what do you suppose would happen if we took away those 20,000 nerve endings that are responsible for allowing you to feel pleasure in the first place? Will it:
A) Make your penis much less sensitive?
B) Make no difference?
C) Make it more sensitive?

That's right! The answer is "A) Make your penis much less sensitive." If you take away the very thing responsible for causing pleasure in the first place, then how can it possibly feel no different when you literally don't have the very thing that's necessary for you to even be able to perceive pleasure in the first place. You have less signals going to the brain now. Arguing that it would make no difference would be like saying removing one of your ears won't negatively affect your hearing. Yes it fucking will. There's no way for it not to. So, no, circumcised dicks are not "just as sensitive", and that's not a good thing to not be sensitive, just so you know.

---
>"Circumcised dicks last longer!"

1) That's not true. In fact, counterintuitively, one of the main problems that circumcised guys have is premature ejaculation. The lack of foreskin actually makes it harder for them to perceive when an orgasm is coming. And I know you're a bunch of morons who can't possibly wrap their brains around how what you think is "merely a flap of skin" could ever possibly be responsible for assisting in control of your orgasm, so I'll explain... The foreskin isn't "just a flap of skin", it's actually one of the most complex parts of the entire body, and more complex than your heart, lungs, and kidneys combined. In fact, it's so complex that only recently have they been able to design dildoes with moveable foreskin, and even then they can't get it 100% right, due to how complex it is (99% of dildoes are uncut, by the way, they're simply designed with the foreskin retracted). So, no, it's not just "a vestigial piece of skin", it has 16+ functions and is more complex than most other parts of the body. One of it's functions is that it has sensory capabilities that assist in orgasm control. This allows uncut men to properly gauge how close to orgasm they are and gives them greater control over their orgasms and allows them to last as long or as quickly as they want. Now, this isn't entirely lost in circumcised men, but it is still VERY severely stunted in them, which results in their propensity for premature ejaculation. They're also 5-7x more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction, too. I'm sure you can figure out why.

2) Even if you did last longer, lasting longer isn't a good thing if you're circumcised, especially for the woman. The most common complaint that women have with circumcised men is that, if they last too long, sex ends up becoming very uncomfortable and even downright painful for them and makes them sore, since, as I explained before, circumcised penises scrape out the natural lubricant and the texture of the circumcised penis, and the lack of foreskin, causes friction inside the vagina, drying it out and causing the woman pain. This isn't a problem for uncut men, though, as this problem simply doesn't occur with them.

---
>"Bro, you're a fucking schizo, take your meds."

Oh no, how dare I talk at great length about a subject that I'm extremely passionate about... Boy, I sure am an unhinged, c-raaaazy fucking schizo for making a long post... Yep... It totally doesn't get more schizo than that... Look, everyone, I made a really long post about something! Aren't I just a raving lunatic? How dare I speak passionately about something in a way that no one else does or will unless I take the initiative, since they won't. *Sigh*

---
>"I'm against infant circumcision, but I think people should be allowed to choose to get circumcised as an adult!"

Then you're a dumb fuckwit with shit opinions and you should put a bullet through your skull. I've never understood this idiotic line of reasoning... Why would you recognize that infant circumcision isn't okay, but then FAIL to realize that adult circumcision also isn't okay? Why does someone simply being older suddenly make it okay in your eyes? Dude, the problem with circumcision isn't the age of the person being circumcised... The problem with circumcision is the act of circumcision ITSELF!!! It's not okay for ANYONE of ANY AGE to be circumcised and you shouldn't be okay with someone getting circumcised as an adult, simply because they're an adult. That doesn't somehow make it automatically okay, simply because they're now an adult fuckhead! Jesus Christ! Be against adult circumcision as well.

Why don't people understand this simple point? And why do people insist on fighting back against it? It makes no fucking sense. None. You shouldn't even want people to be able to get circumcised. It just shouldn't even be an option for anyone, period. And even if for some bizarre fucking reason someone wanted it done, they should just be denied! They shouldn't even be allowed to get it done in the first place or even so much as ask for it! And if someone wanted an adult circumcision, you should do everything in your power to stop them. They're clearly fucking mentally ill. Only mentally ill people want to cut parts off of their own body. Why are you okay with that? What the fuck is wrong with you? Why do you see no problem with it? I fail to see how anyone could be against my position on this matter, especially when this is such a good fucking point that no one else on the planet ever brings up, besides me! I'm literally the only person who takes this position and I just can not understand how anyone could have a problem with my position. It just makes no fucking sense.

I'm literally saying that people shouldn't be able to do bad, harmful things to themselves, and you dumbasses want to sit there and be like "Well, hey now, hold your horses. That's a bit extreme don'tcha think? Wait a minute... You DON'T want people doing stupid shit to themselves, especially if it's harmful? Sorry, man that's too unreasonable". God, you're all so fucking stupid. How the fuck it it unreasonable to suggest that someone shouldn't do something harmful/stupid to themselves? And even if it was "unreasonable", who gives a fuck? There a certain things in this world that we simply SHOULD be unreasonable about and circumcision is one of them, because being unreasonable about circumcision and not allowing it to exist is the only reasonable position.

And speaking of what's unreasonable, I hate this moronic idea of "their body, their choice". Now, look, I get that you're trying to be fair and reasonable by still allowing circumcision to exist in some form, I get that... I know you THINK this is correct position to take, but it isn't, and it's not the position you SHOULD take, either. And I'll tell you why... BECAUSE CIRCUMCISION ISN'T SOMETHING THAT ANYONE SHOULD TRY TO BE FAIR AND REASONABLE ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!!! END OF STORY!!! Why would you even WANT to be fair and reasonable about something like that? What the fuck is wrong with you? Are there any other horrible things that you think we should be fair and reasonable about? Oh, wait, no, of course not. For some fucking reason, you're able to perfectly recognize why those things in particular are bad and why we shouldn't be fair and reasonable about them at all, but with adult circumcision in particular, and literally OOOOONLY VERY, VERY SPECIFICALLY adult circumcision IN PARTICULAR, that's the one bad thing that you think people absolutely HAVE to be fair and reasonable about and have to allow to exist.

I don't understand what compels you people to think like this. I swear to god, it's almost like you have some invisible force controlling you whenever the subject of circumcision comes up and it does everything in it's power to harden your heart make you okay with it. It's so fucking bizarre.

But, going back to the their body, their choice point. The saying should not be "their body, their choice", the saying should be "their body, their choice, BUT ONLY WITHIN REASON!" or "their body, their choice, BUT THERE'S A FUCKING LIMIT!" That's what the saying should be. Wanting to be circumcised is not within reason. It's beyond the limit. Also, you fuckwits take that saying way too far and too literally to the point where you think it applies to everything or that you think it means you should just let people do whatever they want to themselves without restriction. It's not how it works. You're not just supposed to be okay with literally every single little fucking decision they make. There are certain things where you have to put your foot down and say "Yeah, I'm not letting you fucking do that. I don't care if it's your body and your choice, it's a dumb fucking choice, and I'm not gonna let you do something fucking stupid and irreparable to yourself."

There are so many things in this world that you should not be okay with people doing to themselves. Also, I don't see you applying this logic when people do OTHER stupid things. Like, you seem to understand that there is a limit to what you should be okay with people doing to themselves, which is why I find it so odd that you can't extend that limit to include circumcision. Again, you can do it with everything else... EXCEPT for very specifically circumcision in particular, even though it's 1,000 times worse than some of the other shit people do to themselves. Like, how are you able to recognize that someone setting their hand on fire for 2 seconds is bad, but not recognize that someone getting circumcised, which, again, is a 1,000 times worse than someone lighting their hand on fire for 2 seconds (which any damage they suffer would heal quickly) is bad, too, and worse? I don't get it. It makes no sense.

So can we just stop with this "their body, their choice" bullshit and realize there's a limit, please, and that circumcision is over the limit? Infant circumcision isn't the only form of circumcision that's bad, adult circumcision is bad too, as are all forms of circumcision. So, please, for the love of fucking GOD, stop being okay with adult circumcision. Be against it, just like you are with infant circumcision, okay? Again, I don't understand why this position is so hard for people to get behind. In fact, there are some brainless, braindead, fuckwitted idiots out there who would actually want circumcision to still exist and/or be an option in a world where the practice of circumcision was never a thing and nobody would ever want it anyway. I'll say it again, wanting circumcision to still be an option for someone is not the fair and reasonable decision, as circumcision is inherently unreasonable. I hold the superior position in this argument and I always will.

To conclude: Circumcised dicks are ugly, circumcision is evil, uncut dicks look better, feel better, and all women prefer uncut dicks and hate circumcised dicks, as they should. Any refutation you make to anything I said is automatically wrong, by the way, as I'm always 100% objectively correct about literally everything, no matter what, and I can literally never be wrong about anything, no matter what. I'm a gigachad, you're an incel. Deal with it.

---

anonymous Body April 20, 2024 at 1:05 am 1 1