You have an option to go on over to Russia, Get the fuck out of America and try the ol' dictator lifestyle you dipshit nazi.

---

anonymous 9 hours ago

just how come all this dicktator stuff is so popular now and how come they are destroying the cuntry to the tune of kumbb bumm yah?

---

anonymous 9 hours ago

Fuck you, retard!

---

anonymous 8 hours ago

It's important to address your points thoughtfully and to emphasize the historical context and implications of both Hitler and Stalin's regimes.

First, while it's true that perceptions of dictators often fluctuate based on personal ideologies, it’s crucial to recognize that both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin led regimes that were characterized by brutal repression, violence, and widespread human rights abuses.

1. **Comparison of Atrocities**: Hitler's Nazi regime was responsible for the genocide of approximately six million Jews during the Holocaust, alongside the systematic extermination of millions of others deemed "undesirable"—including Romani people, disabled individuals, political dissidents, homosexuals, and more. This level of targeted extermination was extreme and marked one of the darkest periods in human history. On the other hand, Stalin's regime also inflicted immense suffering, with millions dying during famines and purges, particularly during the Great Purge of the late 1930s. Both leaders committed atrocities, but the systematic nature of the Holocaust presents a unique horror that fundamentally distinguishes Hitler's crimes.

2. **Quality of Life under Dictatorships**: You suggest that living under Hitler, assuming one didn't cause trouble, might allow for a somewhat normal life. This is a dangerous oversimplification. The Nazi regime was predicated on racism and discrimination; "normal" life was only accessible to those who conformed to its narrow definitions of humanity. Those who were not part of the Aryan race faced systemic oppression, violence, and extermination. Furthermore, the pervasive fear, propaganda, and repression under both dictatorships would heavily affect any semblance of normalcy, as dissent was met with brutal consequences.

3. **Historical Impact and Ideological Foundation**: Hitler's ideology was built on extreme nationalism, racial purity, and the militaristic goals of the Aryan race, leading to catastrophic wars and a legacy of hatred. Stalin’s ideology, rooted in Marxism-Leninism, aimed for a classless society but resulted in a totalitarian state that crushed opposition and caused immense human suffering. Each dictator’s ideology led to their regimes' horrific consequences, and both should be condemned for the human costs associated with their rule.

4. **The Cold Hard Reality of Dictatorships**: Your assertion that under Stalin, people would merely serve as farm laborers with food rations reflects a misunderstanding of the reality of life in a totalitarian state. Millions were sent to Gulags, and the purges eliminated anyone considered a threat, often based on whim or suspicion. No form of dictatorship offers a safe or humane existence for most of its citizens.

5. **Deciding Between Dictators**: The notion of choosing between dictators as a 'lesser evil' is both morally and ethically problematic. It overlooks the human cost of such regimes and the resilience of individuals who fought against tyranny. Instead of accepting that one dictator might allow for a "safer" life, we should aim to uphold values of democracy, freedom, and human dignity.

In conclusion, we must approach discussions about historical figures and regimes with a careful consideration of the facts and a deep respect for the human lives impacted by such systems. Both Hitler and Stalin served as reminders of the dangers posed by unchecked power and authoritarianism, and it is our responsibility to learn from this history rather than attempt to lessen the impact of such horrors through comparative arguments.

---

anonymous 1 hour ago